Member Login

Meet our E.P.I.C. Researcher, Louis Fernandez

Louis Fernandez is a PhD researcher based at the University of Technology Sydney and his project is part of the Multi-modal Human Robot Collaboration, which is part of the Human Robot Interaction program at the Australian Cobotics Centre. We interviewed Louis recently to find out more about why she does what he does.

  • Tell us a bit about yourself and your research with the Centre? Include the long-term impact of what you are doing.

After completing the first year of my engineering course, I knew that I wanted to work on developing cutting edge technology. I have always had an interest in robotics but found that robotics was not a very popular industry in Australia. My experience during my undergraduate degree working for different robotic companies in Australia was that most of the designs and technology were ‘standardised’ in a sense that many designs were extremely similar across different projects and the tasks involved in robotic related jobs were repetitive and monotonous. This led me towards the path of doing a PhD. My research with the Centre aims to develop frameworks that enables more effective, efficient and safer collaboration between human and robots by looking into ways that can help robots’ human actions or motions through lightweight data.

Why did you decide to be a part of the Australian Cobotics Centre?

Being a part of the Australian Cobotics Centre allows me to work on developing cutting edge technology that can be used to solve problems in the industry that have no clear solution. Furthermore, being part of the ACC allows me to add on the foundational knowledge that would enable humans and robots working together.

  • What project are you most proud of throughout your career and why?

Throughout my research career, the project I am most proud of is my undergraduate capstone project. Compared to the current projects I am working on in my PhD, my undergraduate capstone project was relatively simple. However, it was this project which reinforced my passion for robotics and research. It also enabled me to publish a paper to a local robotics conference (ACRA) which was a memorable experience on its own.

  • What do you hope the long-term impact of your work will be?

I hope to enable robots and humans working side by side. Hopefully, this reduces the fear that ‘robots will take over our jobs’ and move towards the path where robots are seen as tools or ‘co-workers’ used to assist humans in completing a certain task.

  • Aside from your research, what topic could you give an hour-long presentation on with little to no preparation?

I’m currently going through a phase where I’m really into camping so I could probably give hour-long presentation on camping.

Read more about Louis’s project titled ‘Multimodal Human Robot Collaboration’ HERE.

ARTICLE: From Lab to Market (Part I): Navigating the Obstacles in Academic-Industry Collaborations

As a researcher deeply invested in advancing knowledge and innovation, I’ve consistently encountered a significant challenge: securing meaningful partnerships with industry. This gap between academia and industry isn’t just a personal observation; it’s a widespread issue that affects the pace of innovation and the practical application of cutting-edge research. Today, I’d like to dig into why this disconnect exists.

The Barriers to Collaboration

  1. Time Constraints

In the fast-paced world of industry, time is often equated with money. This perspective can create significant barriers to research collaboration:

  • Research Timelines: Academic research often operates on longer timelines, sometimes spanning years. This can clash with the quarterly or annual targets that drive many businesses.
  • Production Slowdowns: There’s a prevalent fear that engaging in research might slow down existing production processes or divert resources from immediate business needs.
  • Return on Investment (ROI) Concerns: Companies often struggle to see the long-term benefits of research when faced with short-term pressures to deliver results.
  1. Financial Considerations

The financial aspect of research collaboration is another major hurdle:

  • High Costs: Cutting-edge research often requires significant financial investment in equipment, materials, and personnel.
  • Limited R&D Budgets: Many businesses, especially small and medium enterprises, lack dedicated research and development budgets.
  • Risk Aversion: There’s an inherent uncertainty in research outcomes, making it a risky investment from a business perspective.
  • Funding Complexities: The procedures for securing and managing research funding can be complex and time-consuming for businesses unfamiliar with academic processes.
  1. Knowledge Gap

Perhaps the most insidious barrier is the knowledge gap that often exists between academia and industry:

  • Technological Unfamiliarity: Many industries are comfortable with their current technologies and processes, making them hesitant to explore new, unproven methods.
  • Resistance to Change: There’s often a cultural resistance to change within established industries, making it difficult to introduce new research-based innovations.
  • Communication Challenges: Researchers and industry professionals may struggle to communicate effectively due to differences in jargon, priorities, and perspectives.
  • Lack of Awareness: Many businesses simply aren’t aware of the potential benefits that academic research could bring to their operations.

The Importance of Collaboration

Despite these challenges, the importance of industry-research collaborations cannot be overstated:

  • Innovation Acceleration: When academics and industry professionals work together, it can dramatically speed up the process of turning theoretical knowledge into practical applications.
  • Real-World Problem Solving: Industry partners provide researchers with insights into real-world challenges, helping to guide research in the most impactful directions.
  • Economic Growth: Successful collaborations can lead to new products, services, and even entirely new industries, driving economic growth.
  • Skill Development: These partnerships provide valuable opportunities for skill exchange, benefiting both academic researchers and industry professionals.

While the benefits are clear, bridging the gap between academia and industry remains a complex challenge. In our next article, we’ll explore potential solutions to strengthen these crucial partnerships. Stay tuned for “Bridging the Gap: Solutions for Effective Industry-Academic Collaboration”.

ARTICLE: Addressing gender pay disparities in engineering

Manufacturing is one of the top 3 engineering-heavy sectors in Australia, employing more than 46,000 qualified engineers. The manufacturing sector currently has a 70% male workforce, as discussed by Australian Cobotics Centre PhD candidate Akash Hettiarachchi in his recent webinar. The importance of gender equity to Australia’s global competitiveness in manufacturing was also highlighted in a recent parliamentary inquiry, which recommended a national strategy to attract and retain under-represented groups (including women) to advanced manufacturing careers. Manufacturing organisations, government departments and industry bodies are making concerted efforts to increase gender balance in the sector so they can achieve the benefits of a diverse workforce. 

At present, only 14% of engineers working in Australia are women. I was recently invited by the Australasian Tunnelling Society and Engineers Australia to present and be part of a panel at an International Women in Engineering Day (INWED) event, Bridging the Gap: Addressing Gender Pay Disparities in Engineering. INWED celebrates women’s contribution to the engineering profession and the 2024 theme is Enhanced by Engineering. However, in all industry sectors and occupations in Australia and most of the world, women’s contribution is still under-valued in terms of pay.  

The current gender pay gap in Australia (the difference between the average earnings of men and women), is 21.7% including full time, part time and casual workers and payments such as bonuses, overtime and commission. This means that on average, for every $1 a male worker makes, a female worker makes 78 cents. The gap is still 13.7% even when only including the base salaries of full-time workers. National statistics, the international Global Gender Gap Index, company reporting, and research show that a gap exists even when considerations such as experience and education are controlled for, and only part of the gap can be attributed to different career choices. A gender pay gap exists across nations, industries, occupations and at different levels of pay. It is however higher in male dominated industry sectors, industries with higher bonus, overtime or commission payments, higher paid roles, and organisations with fewer women in leadership. 

At the Bridging the Gap event, we discussed the gender pay gap, the policy and reporting framework in Australia, and actions that individuals, managers and organisations can take to address pay disparities.  

For the first time in 2024, the Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA) published the gender pay gaps of all private sector employers with 100 or more staff members. The WGEA Data Explorer provides a rich source of data for anyone interested in the gender equity performance, policies and strategies of their own and other organisations. As well as gender pay gap data, policy and action, you can use the WGEA Data Explorer to see and compare industry and employer data on other indicators including the composition of the workforce and boards, access to and use of flexible work and parental leave by men, women and managers, employee consultation and harassment. Initiatives such as conducting and acting on the results of a gender pay audit, making pay more transparent, increasing the proportion of women in leadership, identifying and removing gender bias from recruitment and promotion decisions, and encouraging men to access flexible work and parental leave can all improve the gender pay gap.  

Australian Cobotics Centre Program 5 (The Human-Robot Workforce) has several researchers with experience in researching gender equity. We can assist companies of all sizes to consider how they can evaluate gender equity and realise the benefits for their organisation.